1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 231 Cal.App.4th
  5. 231 Cal.App.4th 1214 (2014)
 

EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B255182.

231 Cal.App.4th 1214 (2014)

180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 620

EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

November 25, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McLeod, Moscarino, Witham & Flynn and John M. Moscarino for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Parker Shumaker Mills, David B. Parker , Mark A. Graf and Jason J. Rudolph for Real Party in Interest.

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

INTRODUCTION

The question before us is whether the attorney-client privilege applies to intrafirm communications between attorneys concerning disputes with a current client, when that client later sues the firm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases