UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, INC.

No. B242864.

231 Cal.App.4th 134 (2014)

180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 173

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

November 5, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayer Brown, Donald Falk , Neil M. Soltman , Michael F. Kerr , Germain D. Labat , Matthew Marmolejo ; Cooley, Steven M. Strauss , M. Ray Hartman III and Summer J. Wynn for Defendants and Appellants.

McKenna Long & Aldridge, Thomas F. Winfield III and Michael H. Wallenstein for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

KUSSMAN, J.*

INTRODUCTION

This is the latest of multiple appeals in a case in which courts have been called upon to determine the amount of rent a pipeline company must pay to a railroad for the use of land underneath its rights-of-way, most of which were initially granted to it by the federal government beginning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases