1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KIGHT v. CASHCALL, INC.
 

KIGHT v. CASHCALL, INC.

No. D063363.

AMANDA KIGHT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CASHCALL, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

November 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Douglas J. Campion, Douglas J. Campion; Hyde & Swigart and Joshua B. Swigart for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Brad W. Seiling, Joanna S. McCallum, Joanna H. Sattler and Justin C. Johnson for Defendant and Respondent.

HALLER, J.

Plaintiffs challenge a court order decertifying a class alleging violations of Penal Code section 632, the statute prohibiting the undisclosed monitoring or recording of confidential telephone conversations.1 We affirm the order.

INTRODUCTION

In 2006, several borrowers sued their lender, CashCall, Inc., alleging CashCall monitored their telephone conversations without their knowledge or consent. Over CashCall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases