1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 231 Cal.App.4th
  5. 231 Cal.App.4th 577 (2014)
 

SQUIRES v. CITY OF EUREKA

Nos. A138768, A139849.

231 Cal.App.4th 577 (2014)

180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 10

FLOYD E. SQUIRES III et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

October 17, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Bradford C. Floyd, Bradford C. Floyd and Carlton D. Floyd for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Cyndy Day-Wilson , City Attorney; Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Manuela Albuquerque for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

RICHMAN, J.—

Appellants Floyd E. Squires III and Betty Squires (when referred to collectively, plaintiffs) sued the City of Eureka and several individuals. The complaint alleged 10 causes of action, the first seven common law claims, the last three under 42 Unites States Code section 1983. Defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion, which the trial court granted as to the first seven causes of action, allowing plaintiffs to conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases