ROMINGER v. COUNTY OF COLUSA

No. C073815.

229 Cal.App.4th 690 (2014)

177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 677

ELAINE ROMINGER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF COLUSA et al. Defendants and Respondents; ADAMS GROUP INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District, Colusa.

Filed September 9, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Jonathan P. Hobbs , Mona G. Ebrahimi and Leslie Z. Walker for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stoel Rives, Timothy M. Taylor , Kristen T. Castanos and Juliet H. Cho for Defendants, Respondents and Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

ROBIE, J.

In this mandamus action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code,1 § 21000 et seq.), plaintiffs Elaine and Gerald Rominger challenged a mitigated negative declaration approved by defendant Colusa County with respect to a subdivision proposed by real party in interest Adams Group Inc. The trial court denied the Romingers' petition based on the conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases