1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 229 Cal.App.4th
  5. 229 Cal.App.4th 264 (2014)
 

PARRISH v. LATHAM & WATKINS

No. B244841.

229 Cal.App.4th 264 (2014)

176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 596

WILLIAM PARRISH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LATHAM & WATKINS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 27, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eagan Avenatti, Michael J. Avenatti , Scott H. Sims ; Panish, Shea & Boyle, Brian J. Panish , Adam K. Shea , Kevin R. Boyle ; Esner, Chang & Boyer and Stuart B. Esner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

McKool Smith Hennigan, J. Michael Hennigan and Michael Swartz for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KLEIN, P. J.—

In a prior litigation, FLIR Systems, Inc., and Indigo Systems Corporation (collectively, FLIR) brought suit against their former employees, William Parrish and E. Timothy Fitzgibbons (collectively, Former Employees) for, among other things, misappropriation of trade secrets (the underlying action). Former Employees were successful in defeating the underlying action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases