CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent;
JOHN TOS et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
John F. Krattli , County Counsel, Charles M. Safer , Assistant County Counsel, and Richard P. Chastang , Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Joanna G. Africa for Southern California Association of Governments as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Griswold, LaSalle, Cobb, Dowd & Gin and Raymond L. Carlson for Real Parties in Interest Kings County Water District and Citizens for California High-Speed Rail Accountability.
Substantial legal questions loom in the trial court as to whether the high-speed rail project the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) seeks to build is the project approved by the voters in 2008. Substantial financial and environmental questions remain to be answered by the Authority in the final funding plan the voters required for each corridor or usable segment of the project. (Sts. & Hy. Code...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.