1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 228 Cal.App.4th
  5. 228 Cal.App.4th 427 (2014)
 

TEMPLETON ACTION COMMITTEE v. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

No. B251788.

228 Cal.App.4th 427 (2014)

175 Cal. Rptr. 3d 346

TEMPLETON ACTION COMMITTEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO et al., Defendants and Respondents; TEMPLETON PROPERTIES, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

July 28, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Jencks Law Group and Michael R. Jencks for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rita L. Neal , County Counsel, Elizabeth L. Martyn and James B. Orton , Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

Clifford Sarkin for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

GILBERT, P. J. —

Plaintiff seeks to set aside San Luis Obispo County's decision to allow a development. Here we decide, among other things, that the developer, an indispensable party, may assert the statute of limitations even though it did not comply with Business and Professions Code section 17900, the so-called fictitious name statute. A rule designed for one purpose is not necessarily a rule designed for other purposes. From...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases