SAN FRANCISCO BEAUTIFUL v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. A136546.

226 Cal.App.4th 1012 (2014)

172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 134

SAN FRANCISCO BEAUTIFUL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents; AT&T CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

April 30, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brandt-Hawley Law Group and Susan Brandt-Hawley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney, Kristen A. Jensen , John Malamut , William K. Sanders and Victoria Wong , Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent.

Mayer Brown , Michael J. Gill , Donald M. Falk , Edward D. Johnson ; Holland & Knight, Amanda Monchamp and Melanie Sengupta for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

RIVERA, J.

AT&T California (AT&T) proposes to install 726 metal utility boxes housing telecommunications equipment on San Francisco sidewalks in order to expand its fiber-optic network (the project). The City and County of San Francisco (the City) approved the project without requiring an environmental impact report (EIR) to be prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases