1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 225 Cal.App.4th
  5. 225 Cal.App.4th 786 (2014)
 

GRAIL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA, INC.

No. H038714.

225 Cal.App.4th 786 (2014)

170 Cal. Rptr. 3d 581

GRAIL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

April 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis Wright Tremaine, Martin L. Fineman and Russell J. Hanlon for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sidley Austin, Peter I. Ostroff , Mark E. Haddad and Michelle B. Goodman for Defendant and Appellant.

OPINION

ELIA, J. —

After a jury reached a verdict in favor of plaintiff Grail Semiconductor, Inc. (Grail), on Grail's action for breach of contract, the trial court ordered a new trial on damages, at the request of defendant Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. (Mitsubishi). Both parties appeal. Mitsubishi contends that (1) the court should have ordered judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) instead of a new trial because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases