ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO., INC. v. KRANE & SMITH, APC

Nos. B237424, B239375.

225 Cal.App.4th 660 (2014)

170 Cal. Rptr. 3d 431

ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KRANE & SMITH, APC, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

April 15, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet , John F. Querio , Jeremy B. Rosen ; Cannon & Nelms, Anthony L. Cannon and Julia A. Mouser for Plaintiff and Appellant. Towle Denison Smith & Maniscalco and Michael C. Denison for Defendants and Respondents.

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Harry W.R. Chamberlain II ; and Michael A. Colton for Association of Southern California Defense Counsel as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

ALDRICH, J.

In this case, we address the applicable statute of limitations when an attorney is sued for malicious prosecution. Almost 13 months after the resolution in the trial court of Sportsmark Trading, Ltd. v. Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2007, No. BC365228) (the Sportsmark action), Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc. (RCG), the defendant therein, filed a malicious prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases