1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 223 Cal.App.4th
  5. 223 Cal.App.4th 326 (2014)
 

FUJIFILM CORP. v. YANG

No. B243770.

223 Cal.App.4th 326 (2014)

167 Cal. Rptr. 3d 241

FUJIFILM CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CINDY YANG, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

January 24, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Richard M. Fannan for Defendant and Appellant.

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, Daniel A. Rozansky , John J. Lucas and Crystal Y. Jonelis for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

RUBIN, J. —

Cindy Yang appeals from the judgment for Fujifilm Corporation (Fuji). According to Yang, Fuji split its cause of action against her. She contends Fuji could have pursued its claims for fraudulent transfers against her in a prior federal court proceeding, and therefore the trial court should have applied res judicata and claim preclusion to bar those claims here. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases