DAILEY v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO

No. D060049.

223 Cal.App.4th 237 (2013)

167 Cal. Rptr. 3d 123

DENISE DAILEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

December 26, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Michael A. Conger, Michael A. Conger ; and Richard H. Benes for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jan I. Goldsmith , City Attorney, and Walter C. Chung , Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

NARES, J.

Plaintiff Denise Dailey (Dailey) asserts the court erred in granting the City of San Diego's (City's) motion for summary judgment on her first cause of action for declaratory relief. In that cause of action Dailey alleged that the City improperly capped her retiree health benefit at $8,880, which she alleges is approximately $600 less than the cost of her actual premiums. She alleges that because the retiree health...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases