1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 222 Cal.App.4th
  5. 222 Cal.App.4th 411 (2013)
 

DATTANI v. LEE

No. A138582.

222 Cal.App.4th 411 (2013)

165 Cal. Rptr. 3d 882

KAUSHIK DATTANI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GEEN HONE LEE, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

December 19, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Michael Heath, Michael Timothy Heath and Howard Olsen for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Leung & Associates, Hanna C. Leung ; Casalina & Disston and Christine A. Chorney for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SIGGINS, J. —

Defendant and respondent Geen Hone Lee has moved to dismiss the appeal of plaintiffs and appellants Kaushik Dattani et al. (Dattanis) on the ground that their notice of appeal was not timely filed. We conclude that an appealable judgment was created when Dattanis filed a request for dismissal without prejudice of all of their causes of action that remained after a grant of summary adjudication against them. Thus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases