1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 222 Cal.App.4th
  5. 222 Cal.App.4th 166 (2013)
 

FAUNCE v. CATE

No. D062130.

222 Cal.App.4th 166 (2013)

166 Cal. Rptr. 3d 61

DAVID W. FAUNCE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MATTHEW CATE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

December 17, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Faunce, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris , Attorney General, Jonathan L. Wolff , Assistant Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson and Christopher H. Findley , Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

McINTYRE, J. —

Penal Code section 636 makes it a crime to eavesdrop on a prisoner's conversation with certain individuals in situations where the prisoner has a reasonable expectation of privacy. (Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) In this case, we conclude that David W. Faunce, a prisoner appearing in propria persona, failed to allege facts showing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases