HAROLD GRIFFITH, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
PAJARO VALLEY WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant and Respondent.
JOSEPH P. PENDRY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
PAJARO VALLEY WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 15, 2013.
October 15, 2013.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Harold Griffith, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant Harold Griffith.
Johnson & James, and Robert K. Johnson , for Plaintiffs and Appellants Joseph P. Pendry, James Spain, Yuet-Ming Chu, William McGrath and Henry Schimpeler.
Aleshire & Wynder and Patricia J. Quilizapa for Association of California Water Agencies and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.
OPINION
PREMO, J., —
After defendant Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency enacted ordinance No. 2010-02 that increased groundwater augmentation charges for the operation of wells within defendant's jurisdiction, plaintiff Harold Griffith challenged the ordinance on the grounds that the increase (1) was procedurally flawed because it was not approved in an election as required by Proposition...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
