1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 219 Cal.App.4th
  5. 219 Cal.App.4th 558 (2013)
 

LITTLE v. PULLMAN

No. B238137.

219 Cal.App.4th 558 (2013)

162 Cal. Rptr. 3d 74

WILLIAM J. LITTLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID PULLMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

September 9, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Pullman, in pro. per.; and Lauren M. Greene for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Office of Mitchel J. Ezer and Mitchel J. Ezer for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

CHANEY, J. —

In prior proceedings, the superior court denied defendant David Pullman's motion to compel arbitration under an arbitration clause in a 2005 agreement. We affirmed the ruling on the ground that a later agreement between the parties, which contained no arbitration provision, superseded the 2005 agreement. (Little v. Pullman (May 19, 2011, B221565) [nonpub. opn.].) Soon after our decision was filed, Pullman ventured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases