1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 219 Cal.App.4th
  5. 219 Cal.App.4th 1396 (2013)
 

ANDREINI & CO. v. MacCORKLE INS. SERVICE, INC.

No. A133473.

219 Cal.App.4th 1396 (2013)

162 Cal. Rptr. 3d 555

ANDREINI & COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MacCORKLE INSURANCE SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

September 9, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hanson Bridgett , Joseph M. Quinn , Adam W. Hofmann ; and David Jay Morgan for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, Mark G. Bonino , Stephen P. Ellingson , Jamie A. Radack ; CMD Associates and C. Matthew Didaleusky for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

RICHMAN, J. —

For the second time in recent years we are called upon to construe the scope of rule 8.278 of the California Rules of Court (rule 8.278), which governs recovery of costs allowed following a successful appeal. Last year the Supreme Court affirmed a decision by this court, and held that "rule 8.278(d)(1)(F) does not authorize an award of costs for interest expenses and fees incurred to borrow funds to deposit as security for a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases