LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

No. B243849.

217 Cal.App.4th 597 (2013)

158 Cal. Rptr. 3d 488

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

June 26, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Holmquist, John F. Walsh , Gregory L. McNair ; Strumwasser & Woocher, Gregory G. Luke and Rachel A. Deutsch for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Troutman Sanders, Paul L. Gale , Peter R. Lucier ; John F. Krattli , County Counsel, and Charles Douglas Lovejoy , Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents County of Los Angeles, Wendy L. Watanabe, as Auditor-Controller for the County of Los Angeles, and Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Commission of the County of Los Angeles and for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents Los Angeles County (General Fund), Los Angeles County Accumulated Outlay Fund, Los Angeles County Library, Los Angeles County Road District No. 1, Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County Fire — Forester and Fire Warden, Bell Gardens Lighting District, Los Angeles County Lighting Maintenance District No. 1697, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Los Angeles County Flood Control Drainage Improvement District, Los Angeles County Flood Control Maintenance, Belvedere Garbage Disposal District, Firestone Garbage Disposal District, Mesa Heights Garbage Disposal District, Consolidated Maintenance Sewage District, Wilmington Cemetery District, Los Angeles County West Vector Control District, Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 23 — Refuse T & D System, Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 1 Operating and Antelope Valley Resource Conservation District.

Carpenter, Rothans & Dumont, Steven J. Rothans , Justin Reade Sarno and Steven J. Wysocky for Defendant and Respondent Successor Agency to the South Gate Community Development Commission and for Real Party in Interest and Respondent City of South Gate.

Olivarez Madruga , Terence J. Gallagher and Matthew Schuman for Defendant and Respondent Successor Agency to the Cudahy Redevelopment Agency and for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents City of Cudahy and City of Cudahy Lighting District Zone 1.

Richards, Watson & Gershon and Gregory M. Kunert for Defendants and Respondents Successor Agency to the San Fernando Redevelopment Agency, Successor Agency to the West Hollywood Community Development Commission and Successor Agency to the Huntington Park Community Development Commission.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents City of Los Angeles, Successor Agency to Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, Successor Agency to the Dissolved Redevelopment Agency of the City of Carson, Successor Agency to Culver City Redevelopment Agency, Successor Agency to the Dissolved Lynwood Redevelopment Agency, Successor Agency to Redevelopment Agency of the City of Long Beach, Successor Agency to Maywood Redevelopment Agency and Successor Agency to the City of Vernon Redevelopment Agency.

No appearance for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents City of Carson, City of Huntington Park, City of Long Beach, City of Lynwood, City of Maywood, City of San Fernando, City of Vernon, City of West Hollywood, Culver City, Southern California Rapid Transit District, Compton Creek Mosquito Abatement District, Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control, West Hollywood Lighting Maintenance District, City of Long Beach Area — Southern California Metropolitan Water District, City of Los Angeles Area — Southern California Metropolitan Water District, City of San Fernando Area — Southern California Metropolitan Water District, Central Basin — Southern California Metropolitan Water District, West Basin — Southern California Metropolitan Water District, Central Basin Municipal Water District and West Basin Municipal Water District.


OPINION

SUZUKAWA, J.

In this writ of mandate proceeding, the superior court entered a July 3, 2012 judgment requiring defendant and respondent County of Los Angeles to include in its calculation of plaintiff and appellant Los Angeles Unified School District's (LAUSD) property tax allocation base the property tax revenue that LAUSD actually received from local Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (ERAF's). The resulting increase in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases