MENDOZA v. HAMZEH

No. B239245.

215 Cal.App.4th 799 (2013)

155 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832

MIGUEL MENDOZA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. REED K. HAMZEH, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

April 22, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Geoffrey T. Stover and Geoffrey T. Stover for Defendant and Appellant.

David A. Cordier for Plaintiff and Respondent.


[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

CHANEY, J.

Defendant Reed K. Hamzeh appeals from an order denying his anti-SLAPP motion and requiring him to pay plaintiff's attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.1 We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In May 2011, plaintiff Miguel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases