DAILEY v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

No. D061055.

214 Cal.App.4th 974 (2013)

154 Cal. Rptr. 3d 480

WILLIAM DAILEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

As modified March 27, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

EMLS, Reza Keramati ; Righetti Glugoski, Matthew Righetti and John Glugoski for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Winston & Strawn, Amanda C. Sommerfeld and Michelle S. Kunihiro for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

IRION, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

William Dailey (Dailey), individually and on behalf of a proposed class of similarly situated individuals, sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears), alleging several causes of action arising from Dailey's core contention that Sears violated California's wage and hour laws, including those governing overtime pay and rest and meal breaks, with respect to its auto center "Managers" and "Assistant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases