1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 213 Cal.App.4th
  5. 213 Cal.App.4th 1059 (2013)
 

SAVE CUYAMA VALLEY v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

No. B233318.

213 Cal.App.4th 1059 (2013)

153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 534

SAVE CUYAMA VALLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA et al., Defendants and Respondents; TROESH MATERIALS, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

As modified February 8, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Babak Naficy and Babak Naficy for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dennis A. Marshall , County Counsel, Michael C. Ghizzoni , Chief Assistant County Counsel, and Rachel Van Mullem , Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, Kerry Shapiro and Scott N. Castro for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

HOFFSTADT, J.* —

Plaintiff Save Cuyama Valley (Save Cuyama) appeals from the judgment denying its petition for a writ of mandate. The County of Santa Barbara and its board of supervisors (collectively, the County) granted real party in interest Troesh Materials, Inc. (Troesh), permission to begin sand and gravel mining in the bed of the Cuyama River. Save Cuyama asks us to overturn that decision. Save...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases