1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 211 Cal.App.4th
  5. 211 Cal.App.4th 522 (2012)
 

CITY OF PLEASANTON v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION

No. A132586.

211 Cal.App.4th 522 (2012)

149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 729

CITY OF PLEASANTON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

November 29, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed Smith, Harvey L. Leiderman and Jeffrey R. Rieger for Defendant and Appellant.

Jonathan P. Lowell , City Attorney, and Michael H. Roush , Special Counsel, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

MARGULIES, J. —

The City of Pleasanton (Pleasanton) and a retired Pleasanton employee, James Linhart, petitioned for a writ of mandate to compel California's Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) and its Board of Administration (board) to retroactively increase Linhart's monthly retirement allowance. Linhart contended the board erred in determining a portion of his compensation as a division chief for the Livermore-Pleasanton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases