1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 210 Cal.App.4th
  5. 210 Cal.App.4th 1484 (2012)
 

STOCKTON CITIZENS FOR SENSIBLE PLANNING v. CITY OF STOCKTON

No. C067164.

210 Cal.App.4th 1484 (2012)

149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 222

STOCKTON CITIZENS FOR SENSIBLE PLANNING et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF STOCKTON et al., Defendants and Respondents; WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

November 13, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Kopper for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Robert J. Stumpf, Jr. , Arthur J. Friedman and Elise K. Sara for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Briscoe Ivester & Bazel, John Briscoe and Lawrence S. Bazel for Real Party in Interest and Respondent A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc.

OPINION

BLEASE, Acting P. J. —

Plaintiffs Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning, Rosemary Atkinson, Paul Diaz, and Susan Rutherford Rich petitioned for writ of mandate to direct defendants City of Stockton (City) and Stockton City Council to vacate its approval of a Wal-Mart Supercenter in the A.G. Spanos Business Park Development in Stockton. After our Supreme Court issued its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases