PRESERVE WILD SANTEE v. CITY OF SANTEE

No. D055215. No. D061030.

210 Cal.App.4th 260 (2012)

148 Cal. Rptr. 3d 310

PRESERVE WILD SANTEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SANTEE et al., Defendants and Appellants; HOMEFED FANITA RANCHO, LLC, Real Party in Interest and Appellant. PRESERVE WILD SANTEE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF SANTEE et al., Defendants and Appellants; HOMEFED FANITA RANCHO, LLC, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

October 19, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Buse , Kevin K. Johnson , Jeanne L. MacKinnon ; and Michael D. Fitts for Plaintiffs and Appellants and for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Best Best & Krieger, Lindsay D. Puckett , Michelle Ouellette and Shawn D. Hagerty for Defendants and Appellants.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Jeffrey A. Chine and Heather S. Riley for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.


OPINION

McCONNELL, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Preserve Wild Santee, Center for Biological Diversity, and Endangered Habitats League, Inc. (collectively, plaintiffs), challenged the certification by the City of Santee (City) of a final environmental impact report (EIR) for a development project in the City's Fanita Ranch area (project), claiming the project failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases