RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. v. STIGLITZ

Nos. E052729, E052807.

209 Cal.App.4th 883 (2012)

147 Cal. Rptr. 3d 292

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAN STIGLITZ, as Hearing Officer, etc., Defendant and Respondent; KRISTY DRINKWATER, Real Party in Interest and Respondent; RIVERSIDE SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION, Intervener and Appellant. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAN STIGLITZ, as Hearing Officer, etc., Defendant and Respondent; KRISTY DRINKWATER, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

September 28, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayes & Cunningham, Dennis J. Hayes and Adam E. Chaikin for Intervener and Appellant.

Stone Busailah , Michael P. Stone , Muna Busailah and Travis M. Poteat for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Lackie, Dammeier & McGill and Michael A. Morguess for Peace Officers' Research Association of California Legal Defense Fund as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Intervener and Appellant and Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Silver, Hadden, Silver, Wexler & Levine, Richard A. Levine and Michael Simidjian for Los Angeles Police Protective League as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Intervener and Appellant and Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Green & Shinee, Richard A. Shinee and Helen L. Schwab for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Intervener and Appellant and Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Ferguson, Praet & Sherman, Jon F. Hamilton , Kimberly A. Wah and Bruce Praet for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Kathleen Bales-Lange , County Counsel (Tulare) and Crystal E. Sullivan , Deputy County Counsel, for California State Association of Counties and California League of Cities as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

Jones & Mayer, Martin J. Mayer , Gregory P. Palmer and Krista MacNevin Jee for California State Sheriffs' Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

McKINSTER, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Following the decision in Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305] (Pitchess), the Legislature enacted Penal Code section 832.7. (See Brown v. Valverde (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1531

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases