FEDERAL INS. CO. v. STEADFAST INS. CO.

No. B227301.

209 Cal.App.4th 668 (2012)

147 Cal. Rptr. 3d 363

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 24, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murchison & Cumming and Edmund G. Farrell III for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Selman Breitman , Neil Selman and Meka Moore for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Patrick Fredette , Jay A. Christofferson and Scott M. Reddie for Defendant, Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

The United States brought an action against the insureds — the Sterling defendants — for discrimination under the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.) (Sterling action). The primary insurance carriers, Steadfast Insurance Company (Steadfast) and Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation (Liberty), insured against claims for "wrongful eviction," "wrongful entry," and "invasion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases