1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 208 Cal.App.4th
  5. 208 Cal.App.4th 1400 (2012)
 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.

No. B230470.

208 Cal.App.4th 1400 (2012)

146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 568

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

As modified September 13, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Munger, Tolles & Olson, Henry Weissmann , Paul J. Watford , Leo Goldbard ; and Brian A. Cardoza for Defendant and Appellant.

Gleam O. Davis for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

CHANEY, J. —

Defendant Southern California Edison Company (Edison) appeals from the judgment entered against it following a bench trial in which the court ruled that Edison was liable to Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific Bell) for just compensation in Pacific Bell's cause of action for inverse condemnation. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases