1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 208 Cal.App.4th
  5. 208 Cal.App.4th 536 (2012)
 

CITY OF CORONA v. LISTON BRICK CO.

No. E053738.

208 Cal.App.4th 536 (2012)

145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702

CITY OF CORONA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LISTON BRICK COMPANY OF CORONA, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

August 14, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of William B. Hanley and William B. Hanley for Defendant and Appellant.

Best Best & Krieger, Mark A. Easter and Kira L. Klatchko for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

RICHLI, J. —

In this eminent domain proceeding, the City of Corona (the City) sought to acquire certain property owned by Liston Brick Company of Corona (Liston). The trial court ruled that all of Liston's evidence of valuation was inadmissible under Evidence Code section 822, subdivision (a). That subdivision provides that, in an eminent domain proceeding, six specified categories of evidence are "inadmissible ... and shall not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases