1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 208 Cal.App.4th
  5. 208 Cal.App.4th 201 (2012)
 

TUCKER v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES

No. A132619.

208 Cal.App.4th 201 (2012)

145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 340

DIANE TUCKER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

August 7, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin & Franklin, J. David Franklin ; Law Offices of Anthony A. Ferrigno and Anthony A. Ferrigno for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Drinker Biddle & Reath, Michael J. Stortz and Beth O. Arnese for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

BRUINIERS, J. —

Plaintiffs (Plaintiffs) alleged that the defendant wireless telephone companies (collectively, Defendants)1 made material misrepresentations to the consuming public as to the actual number of usable (i.e., conversational) airtime minutes in advertised subscriber rate plans.2 The trial court sustained Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases