MACY v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. H037138.

206 Cal.App.4th 1393 (2012)

142 Cal. Rptr. 3d 744

DANIEL JAMES MACY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

May 15, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Page, Salisbury & Dudley and Arthur Dudley for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Kamala D. Harris , Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Sr. , Assistant Attorney General, Sharon Wooden and Bridget Billeter , Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

ELIA, J.

The central issue in this original writ proceeding is whether the trial court was legally obligated to dismiss commitment proceedings brought against petitioner Daniel James Macy pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA or Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.)1 because the original concurring evaluations were conducted using an invalid standardized assessment protocol...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases