1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 207 Cal.App.4th
  5. 207 Cal.App.4th 886 (2012)
 

IN RE F.D.

No. F063363.

207 Cal.App.4th 886 (2012)

144 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1

In re F.D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. F.D., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

June 12, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip J. Cline , District Attorney, Shani D. Jenkins , Assistant District Attorney, Janet E. Wise , Philip W. Esbenshade and John F. Sliney , Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Arthur L. Bowie , under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

WISEMAN, Acting P. J. —

This case presents the question of whether Proposition 21 abolished probation without any confinement time as a disposition in juvenile delinquency proceedings which the prosecutor had the option of filing directly in adult court, but chose to file in juvenile court. It is unnecessary for us to answer that question, however, because here the juvenile court imposed a 30-day juvenile hall commitment in addition to probation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases