CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY

No. F063534.

205 Cal.App.4th 697 (2012)

140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 622

CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; CITY OF SELMA et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

April 26, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of P. Scott Browne, P. Scott Browne and Marsha A. Burch for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Costanzo & Associates, Neal E. Costanzo ; McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Jeffrey M. Reid and Christopher S. Hall for Real Parties in Interest.


CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

OPINION

DAWSON, J.

Consolidated Irrigation District (CID) petitions for a writ of mandate after the respondent superior court denied CID's motion to conduct limited discovery, a motion to augment the record of proceedings,1 and a petition for writ of mandate under the California Public Records Act (Public Records Act) (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases