1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 202 Cal.App.4th
  5. 202 Cal.App.4th 1463 (2012)
 

GHAFFARPOUR v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B234097.

202 Cal.App.4th 1463 (2012)

FIROUZEH GHAFFARPOUR et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; COMMERCE PLAZA HOTEL et al., Real Parties In Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

January 27, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aroustamian & Associates, Ara Aroustamian, Varand Vartanian; Mazur & Mazur, Janice R. Mazur and William E. Mazur, Jr., for Petitioners.

Frederick R. Bennet for Respondent.

No appearance for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

KITCHING, J.—

The issue before this court is whether a superior court local rule conflicts with Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 (section 170.6). We conclude the local rule is void because it conflicts with the statute.

Section 170.6, subdivision (a)(2) states that when the Court of Appeal remands a case to the superior court and the trial judge in the prior proceeding is assigned to conduct a new trial on the matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases