1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 202 Cal.App.4th
  5. 202 Cal.App.4th 1391 (2012)
 

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CO., L.P. v. CITY OF SANTA MARIA

No. B228631.

202 Cal.App.4th 1391 (2012)

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CO., L.P., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA MARIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

January 25, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Afifi Law Group and Faryan Andrew Afifi for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wallin Kress , Reisman & Kranitz, Lisa E. Kraniz ; Gil Trujillo , City Attorney, Philip Sinco , Assistant City Attorney, and Wendy Stockton , Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

YEGAN, J.—

We hold that an action challenging a legislative body's decision to deny a zone change is subject to a 90-day limitations period set forth in Government Code section 65009, subdivision (c)(1)(B).1 Section 65009, subdivision (c)(1) provides that "no action or proceeding shall be maintained... by any person unless the action or proceeding is commenced and service is made on the legislative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases