1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 202 Cal.App.4th
  5. 202 Cal.App.4th 1193 (2012)
 

GOLDMAN v. FRANCHISE TAX BD.

No. A128985.

202 Cal.App.4th 1193 (2012)

136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 373

STEVEN J. GOLDMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

January 23, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy L. Silverstein , Edwin P. Antolin , Johanna W. Roberts and Charles E. Olson for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Kamala D. Harris , Attorney General, Joyce E. Hee and David Lew , Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SIGGINS, J.—

Appellants Steven J. Goldman and Azita Etaati (the Goldmans) seek a refund of interest they paid in 2004 on a state income tax deficiency for the 2000 tax year. While they do not contest the tax owed for 2000, which was increased due to their participation in a disallowed tax shelter, they contend California's Franchise Tax Board (FTB) should have suspended the accrual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases