1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 202 Cal.App.4th
  5. 202 Cal.App.4th 1034 (2012)
 

BRIDGEFORD v. PACIFIC HEALTH CORP.

No. B227486.

202 Cal.App.4th 1034 (2012)

135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 905

DAN BRIDGEFORD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PACIFIC HEALTH CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

January 18, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Mark Yablonovich, Mark Yablonovich , Neda Roshanian and Michael D. Coats for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Silver & Freedman, Andrew B. Kaplan and Jeffrey W. Mayes for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

CROSKEY, J.—

Dan Bridgeford and Lucianna Tarin appeal the dismissal of their complaint after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. They contend the trial court misapplied the doctrine of collateral estoppel in holding that their class claims are precluded, and there is no basis to dismiss their individual claims or their representative claims under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) (Lab...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases