SCHENCK v. COUNTY OF SONOMA

No. A129646.

198 Cal.App.4th 949 (2011)

130 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527

BEVERLY SCHENCK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, Defendant and Respondent; LIQUID INVESTMENTS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

August 26, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Kopper for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Bruce D. Goldstein , County Counsel, and Sue A. Gallagher , Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Clement, Fitzpatrick & Kenworthy, Clayton E. Clement and Anthony Cohen , for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.


CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

OPINION

DONDERO, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action challenging the approval of a project for development of a beverage distribution facility on grounds that the County of Sonoma failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)1 before issuing a mitigated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases