1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 198 Cal.App.4th
  5. 198 Cal.App.4th 926 (2011)
 

CITY OF PALMDALE v. PALMDALE WATER DIST.

No. B224869.

198 Cal.App.4th 926 (2011)

CITY OF PALMDALE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PALMDALE WATER DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

As modified August 9, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. Matthew Ditzhazy , City Attorney; Richards, Watson & Gershon, Gregory M. Kunert , and Whitney G. McDonald , for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lagerlof, Senecal, Gosney & Kruse, Timothy J. Gosney , James D. Ciampa , and Francis J. Santo , for Defendants and Respondents.

Daniel S. Hentschke , for Association of California Water Agencies as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent Palmdale Water District.

OPINION

WOODS, J.—

INTRODUCTION

In this appeal, the City of Palmdale (City) asserts the trial court erred in finding the Palmdale Water District (PWD) had adopted a new water rate structure in conformity with the constitutional requirements of Proposition 218.

(1) After conducting an independent review of the record (Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Assn., Inc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases