TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent;
MICHAEL STEWART, Individually and as Personal Representative, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Ellen J. Gleberman and John Whatley for Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Snell & Wilmer, Mary-Christine Sungaila and Andreea V. Micklis for International Association of Defense Counsel and National Association of Manufacturers as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Coben & Associates Anapol Schwartz and Larry E. Coben for The Attorneys Information Exchange Group as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Steven B. Stevens ; Law Office of Gary Simms and Gary L. Simms for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
OPINION
CROSKEY, J.—
Defendants and petitioners Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, Toyota), seek a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order granting a motion to compel Toyota to produce five of its employees, who are Japanese residents, for deposition in California and to enter a new...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
