Patricia Sturdevant ; Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Kevin P. Roddy ; and Timothy Bittle for NASCAT, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Consumer Federation of California and Utility Reform Network as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Patricia Sturdevant ; Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, Patrick A. Klingman ; Huskinson, Brown, Heidenreich & Carlin and Paul E. Heidenreich for Consumer Action, Consumer Federation of California and NASCAT as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney (San Francisco), Julie Van Nostern , Chief Tax Attorney, and Peter J. Keith , Deputy City Attorney, for League of California Cities, California State Association of Counties and California Special Districts Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr. , County Counsel (Los Angeles) and Albert Ramseyer , Principal Deputy County Counsel, for the County of Los Angeles as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Supreme Court of California.
OPINION
CHIN, J.—
In this case, we must decide whether Government Code section 910 (section 910)1 allows taxpayers to file a class action claim against a municipal governmental entity for the refund of local taxes. In City of San Jose v. Superior Court (1974) 12 Cal.3d 447, 455 [115 Cal.Rptr. 797, 525 P.2d...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.