SPICER v. CITY OF CAMARILLO

No. B228357.

195 Cal.App.4th 1423 (2011)

THOMAS O. SPICER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMARILLO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

May 31, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifton E. Reed for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of Alan E. Wisotsky, Alan E. Wisotsky and Jeffrey Held for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

GILBERT, P. J.—

A local ordinance limits parking times on city streets. On those streets where posted signs limit the parking times, the Vehicle Code permits disabled persons displaying a placard to park an unlimited time. On streets where no such signs are posted, may disabled persons park an unlimited time? We conclude they may not because no statute permits such unlimited parking.

Thomas O. Spicer appeals a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases