1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 193 Cal.App.4th
  5. 193 Cal.App.4th 874 (2011)
 

VAFI v. McCLOSKEY

No. B223237.

193 Cal.App.4th 874 (2011)

SASSAN VAFI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HEATHER McCLOSKEY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

March 22, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Farrah Mirabel and Farrah Mirabel for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, Allan B. Cooper and Lauren J. Katunich for Defendants and Respondents.

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

OPINION

BIGELOW, P. J.—

This matter presents an issue which it seems no reported decision has addressed: Which statute of limitations applies to an action for malicious prosecution against an attorney? We conclude that the limitations period applicable to actions against attorneys under section 340.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases