LA v. NOKIA, INC.

No. B183735.

HENRY LA, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NOKIA, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

Filed October 28, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, Paul R. Kiesel and Patrick DeBlase; Giskan & Solataroff and Oren S. Giskan; and Sheller, Ludwig & Badey, Jonathan Shub and Scott C. Johnson, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Thomas R. Freeman, Terry W. Bird and Sharon Ben-Shahar; Alston & Bird, Randall L. Allen and Peter Kontio, for Defendant and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

Henry La bought a Nokia cellular phone with an allegedly defective display screen that faded or went blank, making it difficult to read phone numbers or text messages. He brought a putative class action against Nokia based on its conduct in concealing the screen defect, which he alleges was a known defect at the time he bought the phone. La lost the allegedly defective phone but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases