1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 188 Cal.App.4th
  5. 188 Cal.App.4th 1383 (2010)
 

PEOPLE v. PHILLIPS

No. B221932.

188 Cal.App.4th 1383 (2010)

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHANIEL PHILLIPS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

October 5, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linn Davis , under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Steve Cooley , District Attorney, Roberta Schwartz and Patrick Moran , Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WOODS, J.—

Before this court, Nathaniel Phillips asserts that sufficient evidence did not support his conviction for a violation of Penal Code section 647.6, subdivision (a)(1) because there was no evidence that he directed his criminal conduct towards a specific child as required by the statute. Based on our review of the statutory language and its purpose to protect all children from sexual predators, we find sufficient evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases