1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 187 Cal.App.4th
  5. 187 Cal.App.4th 1405 (2010)
 

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY v. UNIVERSAL PARAGON CORP.

No. A126149.

187 Cal.App.4th 1405 (2010)

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UNIVERSAL PARAGON CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

As modified September 21, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Daniel M. Kolkey, Kaiponanea T. Matsumura and Gina Moon for Defendants and Appellants.

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, Nancy L. Fineman, Philip L. Gregory; Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley and Susan H. Handelman for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

NEEDHAM, J.—

Appellant Universal Paragon Corporation, formerly known as Tuntex (USA), Inc. (UPC), hired respondent law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy (CP&M) to represent it in complex environmental litigation. After a settlement in the underlying action was reached, UPC and CP&M were unable to agree on the amount of fees owed to CP&M under their written fee agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases