1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 187 Cal.App.4th
  5. 187 Cal.App.4th 852 (2010)
 

RADFORD v. SHEHORN

No. B216323.

187 Cal.App.4th 852 (2010)

114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 499

SUZANNE C. RADFORD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MELINDA SHEHORN, as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

August 19, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Law Office of John Derrick and John Derrick for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Edsall Arrieta, David E. Edsall, Timothy S. Camarena, Cristian R. Arrieta; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith and Jeffry A. Miller for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

GILBERT, P.J.—

Mediators facilitate settlement of legal disputes. They use a variety of techniques to achieve that goal which include listening, enlightening, suggesting, empathizing and, sometimes, cajoling. But once the mediation is concluded, the mediator may not offer clarification concerning the mediation or a disputed settlement unless the parties agree otherwise. Like an

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases