1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 186 Cal.App.4th
  5. 186 Cal.App.4th 1548 (2010)
 

TUCKER v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES

No. A126077.

186 Cal.App.4th 1548 (2010)

DIANE TUCKER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

July 29, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin & Franklin, J. David Franklin and Anthony A. Ferrigno for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Drinker Biddle & Reath, Michael J. Stortz and Beth O. Arnese for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

JONES, P. J.—

In this proposed class action, plaintiffs allege defendant cell phone providers, Pacific Bell Mobile Services and Cingular Wireless LLC (collectively defendants) violated the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) by selling "`bucket plans'" without informing consumers how the length of each telephone call would be calculated.1

In early 2009, defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases