ALVISO v. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.

No. A126241.

186 Cal.App.4th 198 (2010)

DAVID S. ALVISO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 30, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Clausen for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Jonathan K. Renner, Assistant Attorney General, Constance L. LeLouis and Daniel J. Powell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent California Attorney General.

Steven M. Woodside, County Counsel, and Anne L. Keck, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent Sonoma County Sheriff's Department.


OPINION

SIGGINS, J.

Does a law that authorizes the 30-day impoundment of a vehicle driven on a revoked or suspended license violate the vehicle owner's constitutional rights? Appellant David S. Alviso, whose car was impounded pursuant to Vehicle Code sections 14602.6 and 22852, contends the statutory impoundment scheme violates state and federal constitutional principles of equal protection, due process, and freedom from unreasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases