1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 186 Cal.App.4th
  5. 186 Cal.App.4th 399 (2010)
 

MUNOZ v. BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF LOS ANGELES

No. B215594.

186 Cal.App.4th 399 (2010)

TOM MUNOZ et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent; GREG (TONY) GREENWELL, Objector and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

June 10, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Righetti Law Firm, Matthew Righetti and John Glugoski for Objector and Appellant.

Law Offices of James P. Stoneman II, James P. Stoneman II; Law Offices of Mark R. Haddon and Mark R. Haddon for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Jennifer B. Robinson, T. Harold Pinkley and Tara L. Ferguson for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

GRIMES, J.—

SUMMARY

Tom Munoz and Phillip Eichten filed a class action lawsuit against BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (BCI), seeking damages and penalties for allegedly unpaid overtime wages, missed meal and rest period wages, and other Labor Code violations and unfair business practices. The proposed class consisted of production supervisors and merchandising supervisors who were allegedly misclassified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases